Kant – Writ of Summons (09 April 2024)

Form 20 – Writ of summons
Note: see rule 27.01.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MELBOURNE REGISTRY

BETWEEN: JAN MAREK KANT
Plaintiff

and

THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF AUSTRALIA
Defendant

WRIT OF SUMMONS

KING CHARLES THE THIRD, by the Grace of God, King of Australia and his other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth:

TO THE DEFENDANT
The Chief Justice of Australia
The Australian Government Solicitor

TAKE NOTICE that this proceeding has been brought against you by the plaintiff for the claim set out in this Writ.

IF YOU INTEND TO DEFEND the proceeding you must file a notice of appearance.

IF YOU ARE WILLING TO SUBMIT to any order that the Court may make, save as to costs, you may file a submitting appearance.

THE TIME FOR FILING AN APPEARANCE is as follows:

(a) where you are served with the application within Australia – 14 days from the date of service;

(b) in any other case – 42 days from the date of service.

STATEMENT OF CLAIM

[paragraph 1 through paragraph 7 redacted]

Examination and Discovery

8. s.3 Habeas Corpus Act 1816 vests the Court with jurisdiction to proceed in examination into the truth of facts herein; and,
9. s.6 Habeas Corpus Act 1816 vests the Court with jurisdiction to examine all persons concerned in all matters subject to review on Writ of Habeas Corpus; and,
10. s.15C Acts Interpretation Act 1901 gives that jurisdiction of the Court to proceed in examination into truth of facts on Writ of Habeas Corpus is not limited by any limits to which any other jurisdiction of the Court is subject.
11. A court can order discovery of documents created on examination into truth of facts on Writ of Habeas Corpus.

[paragraph 12 through paragraph 24 redacted]

Conduct of the High Court of Australia

25. The High Court of Australia failed or refused to strike down Division 104 Criminal Code despite it being illegal.

-4-

Particulars
Division 104 Criminal Code standing at present is sufficient proof of the High Court of Australia having breached a duty of ensuring that extant legislation is not illegal.

26. The High Court of Australia failed or refused to strike down National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 despite it being illegal.
    Particulars
    National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 standing at present is sufficient proof of the High Court of Australia having breached a duty of ensuring that extant legislation is not illegal.

[paragraph 27 through paragraph 29 redacted]

Grievance

30. The Plaintiff is restrained of his liberty by effect of control orders made under Division 104 Criminal Code and/or similar instruments.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
31. The Plaintiff is prevented from accessing information about his intellectual property by the National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions.
    Particulars

-5-

i. The Commonwealth acquired intellectual property of the Plaintiff in connexion with his work for the Defence Science and Technology Group.
ii. Intellectual property of the Plaintiff includes materials that are subject to dissemination limits due to National Security requirements.
iii. Further particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.

32. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004, and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from accessing information concerning his detention.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
33. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from knowing the particular machinery used to detain him.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
34. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from challenging individually the control orders and/or similar instruments issued against him.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
35. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding against the Commonwealth in respect of its theft of his intellectual property.
    Particulars

-6-

i. The Commonwealth acquired intellectual property of the Plaintiff in connexion with his work for the Defence Science and Technology Group.
ii. Officers of the Commonwealth engaged in deception with intent to cause the Plaintiff to believe that his intellectual property was not acquired.
iii. Further particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.

36. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding against the Commonwealth in misfeasance in public office.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
37. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding against the Commonwealth in malicious prosecution.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
38. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding against the Commonwealth in torts at common law generally.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
39. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding under s.11 Habeas Corpus Act 1679 against the Commonwealth in respect of his false imprisonment.

Particulars

-7-

Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.

40. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding under s.11 Habeas Corpus Act 1679 against officers of the Commonwealth in respect of his false imprisonment.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
41. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding under s.11 Habeas Corpus Act 1679 in respect of his false imprisonment generally.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
42. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding under s.11 Habeas Corpus Act 1679 against people who frame for his Datainer.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
43. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding under s.11 Habeas Corpus Act 1679 against people who contrive for his Datainer.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
44. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or
    similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding under s.11 Habeas

-8-

Corpus Act 1679 against people who aid or advise or otherwise assist those who frame for his Datainer.
Particulars
Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.

45. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding under s.11 Habeas Corpus Act 1679 against people who aid or advise or otherwise assist those who contrive for his Datainer.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
46. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent criminal prosecution in respect of crimes of corruption committed against the Plaintiff.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
47. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or
    similar statutory provisions prevent criminal prosecution in respect of crimes committed against the Plaintiff generally.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
48. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding against members of Parliament in respect of Ministerial decisions and/or conduct.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.

-9-

49. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding against members of Parliament generally.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
50. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding against the Commonwealth in respect of failures or refusals to deliver, upon Demands made by him, true copies of the Warrant or Warrants of his Detayner.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
51. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding against officers of the Commonwealth in respect of failures or refusals to deliver, upon Demands made by him, true copies of the Warrant or Warrants of his Detayner.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
52. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions prevent the Plaintiff from proceeding in respect of failures or refusals to deliver, upon Demands made by him, true copies of the Warrant or Warrants of his Detayner generally.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
53. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or
    similar statutory provisions are used in keeping the Plaintiff unlawfully detained by the
    Commonwealth.

-10-

Particulars
Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.

54. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions are used in keeping the Plaintiff unlawfully detained by governments generally.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
55. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions are used in keeping the Plaintiff unlawfully detained by officers of the Commonwealth.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
56. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions are used in keeping the Plaintiff unlawfully detained by persons acting in official capacities generally.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
57. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or
    similar statutory provisions are used in keeping the Plaintiff unlawfully detained by persons acting in concert with officers of the Commonwealth.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
58. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions keep the Plaintiff unlawfully detained by persons acting in concert with those who act in official capacities generally.

-11-

Particulars
Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.

59. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions are used in keeping the Plaintiff illegally subjected to punishment of Martiall Lawe.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
60. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions are used in keeping the Plaintiff arbitrarily subjected to punishment of Martiall Lawe.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
61. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions keep the Plaintiff arbitrarily subjected to illegal punishment.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
62. The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 and/or similar statutory provisions keep the Plaintiff subjected generally to illegal punishment.
    Particulars
    Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.

[paragraph 63 through paragraph 64 redacted]

Martiall Lawe

65. The Plaintiff is a citizen of Australia and was so since birth.
66. The Plaintiff was never employed by the Commonwealth, except by the Department of Defence under the Public Service Act 1999.
67. The Plaintiff was never contracted to provide goods or services by the Commonwealth otherwise than in employment by the Department of Defence under the Public Service Act 1999.
68. The Plaintiff was never contracted to provide goods or serviced to the Commonwealth otherwise than in employment by the Department of Defence under the Public Service Act 1999.
69. The Plaintiff was never employed by the government of a State or Territory, except by the former Department of Justice of Victoria.
70. The Plaintiff was never contracted to provide goods or services by the government of a State or Territory otherwise than in employment by the former Department of Justice of Victoria.
71. The Plaintiff was never contracted to provide goods or services to the government of a State or Territory otherwise than in employment by the former Department of Justice of Victoria.

-13-

72. The Plaintiff was never employed by a foreign power within meaning of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
73. The Plaintiff was never contracted to provide goods or services by a foreign power within meaning of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
74. The Plaintiff was never contracted to provide goods or services to a foreign power within meaning of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
75. The Plaintiff was never employed by a law enforcement agency within meaning of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, except as Prison Officer and Trainee Prison Officer employed by the former Department of Justice of Victoria.
76. The Plaintiff was never contracted to provide goods or services by a law enforcement agency within meaning of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, except as Prison Officer and Trainee Prison Officer when employed by the former Department of Justice of Victoria.
77. The Plaintiff was never contracted to provide goods or services to a law enforcement agency within meaning of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, except as Prison Officer and Trainee Prison Officer when employed by the former Department of Justice of Victoria.
78. The Plaintiff was never a defence member within meaning of Defence Force Discipline Act 1982.
79. The Plaintiff was never a defence civilian within meaning of Defence Force Discipline Act 1982.
80. The Plaintiff was never a representative or agent of the enemy within meaning of Defence Force Discipline Act 1982.
81. The Plaintiff was never a member of an armed force of a body politic within meaning as of Defence Force Discipline Act 1982.
82. The Plaintiff was never contracted to provide goods or services by an armed force of a body politic within meaning as of Defence Force Discipline Act 1982, otherwise than in employment by the Department of Defence under the Public Service Act 1999.

-14-

83. The Plaintiff was never contracted to provide goods or services to an armed force of a body politic within meaning as of Defence Force Discipline Act 1982, otherwise than in employment by the Department of Defence under the Public Service Act 1999.
84. The Plaintiff was never contracted to provide goods or services by an armed force or other force that constitutes the enemy within meaning of Defence Force Discipline Act 1982.
85. The Plaintiff was never contracted to provide goods or services to an armed force or other force that constitutes the enemy within meaning of Defence Force Discipline Act 1982.
86. The Plaintiff was never employed by an intelligence agency within meaning of Office of National Intelligence Act 2018.
87. The Plaintiff was never employed by an agency with an intelligence role or function within meaning of Office of National Intelligence Act 2018.
88. The Plaintiff was never employed by a subordinate entity of a body politic with functions corresponding to those of an intelligence agency within meaning of Office of National Intelligence Act 2018.
89. The Plaintiff was never employed by a subordinate entity of a body politic with functions corresponding to those of an agency with an intelligence role or function within meaning of Office of National Intelligence Act 2018.
90. The Plaintiff was never an affiliate, within meaning as of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, of an intelligence agency within meaning of Office of National Intelligence Act 2018.
91. The Plaintiff was never an affiliate, within meaning as of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, of an agency with an intelligence role or function within meaning of Office of National Intelligence Act 2018.
92. The Plaintiff was never an affiliate, within meaning as of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, to a subordinate entity of a body politic with functions corresponding to those of an intelligence agency within meaning of Office of National Intelligence Act 2018.

-15-

93. The Plaintiff was never an affiliate, within meaning as of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, to a subordinate entity of a body politic with functions corresponding to those of an agency with an intelligence role or function within meaning of Office of National Intelligence Act 2018.
94. The Plaintiff was never an affiliate, within meaning as of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, to a foreign power within meaning of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
95. The Plaintiff was never an affiliate, within meaning as of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, to an armed force of a body politic within meaning of Defence Force Discipline Act 1982, otherwise than in employment by the Department of Defence under the Public Service Act 1999.
96. The Plaintiff was never an affiliate, within meaning as of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, to an armed force or other force that constitutes the enemy within meaning of Defence Force Discipline Act 1982.
97. The Plaintiff was never an entrusted person, within meaning as of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, in relation to an intelligence agency within meaning of Office of National Intelligence Act 2018.
98. The Plaintiff was never an entrusted person, within meaning as of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, in relation to a subordinate entity of a body politic with functions corresponding to those of an intelligence agency within meaning of Office of National Intelligence Act 2018.
99. The Plaintiff was never an entrusted person within meaning as of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, in relation to an armed force of a body politic within meaning as of Defence Force Discipline Act 1982, otherwise than in employment by the Department of Defence under the Public Service Act 1999.
100. The Plaintiff was never an entrusted person, within meaning as of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, in relation to an armed force or other force that constitutes the enemy within meaning as of Defence Force Discipline Act 1982.

-16-

101. The Plaintiff never engaged in activities prejudicial to security within meaning of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
102. The Plaintiff never engaged in promotion of communal violence within meaning of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
103. The Plaintiff never committed an act of foreign interference within meaning of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
104. The Plaintiff never committed an attack on Australia’s defence system within meaning of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
105. The Plaintiff never committed an act of politically motivated violence within meaning of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
106. The Plaintiff was never a participant in a special intelligence operation within meaning of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
107. The Plaintiff was never questioned on record, in relation to a serious crime, by an officer of a law enforcement agency within meaning as of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
108. The Plaintiff was never questioned on record, in relation to an indictable offence, by an officer of a law enforcement agency within meaning as of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
109. The Plaintiff was never charged with having committed a serious crime within meaning of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
110. The Plaintiff was never arrested on suspicion of having committed a serious crime within meaning of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
111. The Plaintiff was never charged with having committed an indictable offence.
112. The Plaintiff was never arrested on suspicion of having committed an indictable offence.
113. The Plaintiff was never charged with having committed a summary offence as an adult.

-17-

114. The Plaintiff was never arrested on suspicion of having committed a summary offence as an adult.
115. The Plaintiff never submitted to jurisdictions of courts-martial.
116. The Plaintiff never submitted to jurisdictions of courts, tribunals or commissions other than of ordinary courts of law.
117. Subjecting the Plaintiff to punishment of Martiall Lawe is illegal.
118. Subjecting the Plaintiff to punishment of law, other than law as administered by ordinary courts of law, is illegal.
119. Subjecting the Plaintiff to punishment of law is illegal generally.

[paragraph 120 through paragraph 160 redacted]

Division 104 Criminal Code

161. Division 104 Criminal Code treats pretended Criminall Offences.
162. Division 104 Criminal Code can be used to subject ordinary people to punishment of Martiall Lawe.
163. Division 104 Criminal Code can be used to subject ordinary people to punishment of law absent criminal offences.

[paragraph 164 through paragraph 169 redacted]

170. Despite judgements of the High Court of Australia to contrary effect, Division 104 Criminal Code is illegal because of Chapter III of the Constitution.
     Particulars
     The High Court of Australia considered legality of Division 104 Criminal Code in Thomas v Mowbray [2007] HCA 33.
171. Despite judgements of the High Court of Australia to contrary effect, Division 104 Criminal Code is illegal because of section 51 of the Constitution construed subject to Chapter III of the Constitution.
     Particulars
     The High Court of Australia considered legality of Division 104 Criminal Code in Thomas v Mowbray [2007] HCA 33.

National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004

172. National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 can be used to cause ordinary people to remain subjected to punishment of Martiall Lawe.
173. National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 can be used to cause ordinary people to remain subjected to punishment of law absent criminal offences.
174. National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 can be used to protect the reputation of a politician.
175. National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 can be used to protect the interests of a cabal.
176. National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 is illegal because of the implied constitutional freedom of political communication.

[paragraph 177 through paragraph 182 redacted]

183. National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 is illegal because of Chapter III of the Constitution.
184. National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 is illegal because of section 51 of the Constitution construed subject to Chapter III of the Constitution.

[paragraph 185 through paragraph 275 redacted]

276. Division 104 Criminal Code is contrary to rights of Article 9 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
277. Division 104 Criminal Code is contrary to rights of Article 14 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
278. Division 104 Criminal Code is contrary to rights of Article 19 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

[paragraph 279 through paragraph 285 redacted]

286. National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 is contrary to rights of Article 9 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
287. National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 is contrary to rights of Article 14 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
288. National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 is contrary to rights of Article 19 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

[paragraph 289 through paragraph 306 redacted]

307. Failure or refusal to provide relief as claimed by the Plaintiff exhausts all remedies for purposes of Article 2 of Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
308. Failure or refusal by the Court to consider the matter, as brought by the Plaintiff, exhausts all remedies for purposes of Article 2 of Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
309. Failure or refusal by the Court to determine the matter, as brought by the Plaintiff, exhausts all remedies for purposes of Article 2 of Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
310. Failure or refusal by the Court to determine the matter, as brought by the Plaintiff and without unreasonable delay, exhausts all remedies for purposes of Article 2 of Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

-34-

Remedy

311. The Plaintiff claims relief in form of orders striking down Division 104 Criminal Code.
312. The Plaintiff claims relief in form of orders striking down National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004.
313. The Plaintiff claims relief in form of orders voiding all Ministerial decisions made under 104.2 Criminal Code that may have bearing on his rights.
314. The Plaintiff claims relief in form of orders voiding all instruments issued under Division 104 Criminal Code that may have bearing on his rights.
315. The Plaintiff claims relief in form of orders voiding all instruments issued under National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 that may have bearing on his rights.
316. The Plaintiff claims relief in form of orders voiding all directions given under National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 that may have bearing on his rights.
317. The Plaintiff claims relief in form of closed court orders causing publication of the Court’s Reasons for decision in respect of every numbered item herein, under s.28 Open Courts Act 2013; or,
318. Alternatively: The Plaintiff claims relief in form of non-publication orders causing publication of the Court’s Reasons for decision in respect of every numbered item herein, under s.77RE Judiciary Act 1903; or,
319. Alternatively: The Plaintiff claims relief in form of orders causing publication of the Court’s Reasons for decision in respect of every numbered item herein, under s.80 Judiciary Act 1903; or,
320. Alternatively: The Plaintiff claims relief in form of orders causing publication of the Court’s Reasons for decision in respect of every numbered item herein, under the common law.

-35-

321. The Plaintiff claims relief in form of proceeding suppression orders causing that no information given or produced in this proceeding can at any time be made the subject of a suppression or non-publication order (however described) that limits its dissemination except as necessary for protecting the safety of persons who would otherwise be identifiable, under s.17 Open Courts Act 2013; or,
322. Alternatively: The Plaintiff claims relief in form of suppression orders causing that no information given or produced in this proceeding can at any time be made the subject of a suppression or non-publication order (however described) that limits its dissemination except as necessary for protecting the safety of persons who would otherwise be identifiable, under s.77RE Judiciary Act 1903; or,
323. Alternatively: The Plaintiff claims relief in form of orders causing that no information given or produced in this proceeding can at any time be made the subject of a suppression or non-publication order (however described) that limits its dissemination except as necessary for protecting the safety of persons who would otherwise be identifiable, under s.80 Judiciary Act 1903; or,
324. Alternatively: The Plaintiff claims relief in form of orders causing that no information given or produced in this proceeding can at any time be made the subject of a suppression or non-publication order (however described) that limits its dissemination except as necessary for protecting the safety of persons who would otherwise be identifiable, under the common law.
325. The Plaintiff claims such other remedy as is appropriate.
     Particulars
     Particulars may be provided following discovery after examination into the truth of facts herein.
326. The Plaintiff claims costs or damages in lieu thereof.
     Particulars
     The plaintiff is self-represented.

-36-

Dated 09 April 2024

Plaintiff

The plaintiff is self-represented.

[page 37 through page 55 redacted]